Skip to content

Conversation

@sejeong8
Copy link

@sejeong8 sejeong8 commented Feb 4, 2026

Changed beam energy in pythia8

@sejeong8 sejeong8 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2026 07:33
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

@jackal1-66
Copy link
Collaborator

Tagging @stefanopolitano. Is there a reason why to move the energy to 5.36 TeV in pp? I see this configuration is currently used only in MC/config/PWGHF/ini/GeneratorHF_HFe_ccbar_and_bbar_gap5_Mode2.ini

@sejeong8
Copy link
Author

sejeong8 commented Feb 6, 2026

It is for the production of the pp reference MC

@stefanopolitano
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sejeong8 and @jackal1-66 ! Thanks for the work. Indeed, I would suggest not to modify the energy value in this config, but rather creating a dedicated one for the ppref (as previously done, see here ) to avoid confusion in the future

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants