Skip to content

CLDSRV-835: Add troubleshooting details to CI#6106

Merged
bert-e merged 3 commits intodevelopment/9.3from
bugfix/CLDSRV-835-CI-details
Mar 18, 2026
Merged

CLDSRV-835: Add troubleshooting details to CI#6106
bert-e merged 3 commits intodevelopment/9.3from
bugfix/CLDSRV-835-CI-details

Conversation

@BourgoisMickael
Copy link
Contributor

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael commented Mar 12, 2026

  • Add mongodb logs to artifacts
  • Collect workflow telemetry

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 12, 2026

Hello bourgoismickael,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 12, 2026

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.23%. Comparing base (1ff2d99) to head (0b93adb).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on development/9.3.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph
see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.3    #6106      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            84.25%   84.23%   -0.02%     
===================================================
  Files                  206      206              
  Lines                13251    13251              
===================================================
- Hits                 11164    11162       -2     
- Misses                2087     2089       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 67.91% <ø> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests 28.08% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 69.11% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v1-ft-tests 69.13% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 35.10% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests 36.46% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests-inflights 37.49% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit 69.90% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 34.36% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael force-pushed the bugfix/CLDSRV-835-CI-details branch from d5e259e to 2c3dc53 Compare March 13, 2026 14:20
@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael changed the base branch from development/9.2 to development/9.3 March 13, 2026 14:20
@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael force-pushed the bugfix/CLDSRV-835-CI-details branch 2 times, most recently from aedfe0a to 561cc7c Compare March 13, 2026 15:09
@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael force-pushed the bugfix/CLDSRV-835-CI-details branch 2 times, most recently from 8990901 to 5b14816 Compare March 13, 2026 16:12
# uses: catchpoint/workflow-telemetry-action@v2
# Use a fork that fixes chart issue
# https://github.com/catchpoint/workflow-telemetry-action/pull/98
uses: whywaita/workflow-telemetry-action@use_quickchart
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Supply chain risk: This pins to a branch (@use_quickchart) on a third-party fork. The branch can be force-pushed at any time with arbitrary code that runs in your CI. Pin to a specific commit SHA instead.

— Claude Code

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that's fair, configuring it to the sha for now would be good and eventually when we know more about the state of the telemetry action we'll do something about it.

Or fork it inside the org (if you don't have permissions to do so let me know and I can do it for you).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replaced branch by commit in 0b93adb

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Mar 13, 2026

  • Supply chain risk in .github/actions/setup-ci/action.yaml:59: the telemetry action is pinned to a branch on a third-party fork which can be force-pushed with malicious code. Pin to a full commit SHA to prevent tampering.

Review by Claude Code

@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude bot Mar 16, 2026
@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael force-pushed the bugfix/CLDSRV-835-CI-details branch from 5b14816 to e83e6f1 Compare March 16, 2026 01:26
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Mar 16, 2026
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Mar 16, 2026

  • Security: unpinned third-party GitHub Action - whywaita/workflow-telemetry-action@use_quickchart uses a branch ref instead of a pinned commit SHA. Pin to the commit SHA and keep the branch name as a comment.

    Review by Claude Code

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael requested review from a team, anurag4DSB, fredmnl and jonathan-gramain and removed request for a team March 17, 2026 15:58
Copy link
Contributor

@anurag4DSB anurag4DSB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add some developer docs so that everyone knows how to use collected metrics

@BourgoisMickael
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can we add some developer docs so that everyone knows how to use collected metrics

@anurag4DSB It's charts posted on the action summary: https://github.com/scality/cloudserver/actions/runs/23124100067?pr=6106

To avoid supply chain attack if branch is pushed new commits
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Mar 18, 2026

LGTM

Review by Claude Code

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael requested a review from tcarmet March 18, 2026 16:17
@BourgoisMickael
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 18, 2026

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 18, 2026

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/9.3

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 18, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.3

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-835.

Goodbye bourgoismickael.

@bert-e bert-e merged commit b045823 into development/9.3 Mar 18, 2026
30 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the bugfix/CLDSRV-835-CI-details branch March 18, 2026 19:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants