CLDSRV-835: Retry flaky upload socket hang up

[BourgoisMickael]

  1) DELETE object
       With default signature
         with multipart upload
           "before all" hook for "should delete a object uploaded in parts successfully":
     TimeoutError: socket hang up

[bert-e]

Hello bourgoismickael,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options

name	description	privileged	authored
/after_pull_request	Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval	Bypass the pull request author's approval	⭐
/bypass_build_status	Bypass the build and test status	⭐
/bypass_commit_size	Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA	⭐
/bypass_incompatible_branch	Bypass the check on the source branch prefix	⭐
/bypass_jira_check	Bypass the Jira issue check	⭐
/bypass_peer_approval	Bypass the pull request peers' approval	⭐
/bypass_leader_approval	Bypass the pull request leaders' approval	⭐
/approve	Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request.		✍️
/create_pull_requests	Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches	Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus	Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity	Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait	Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.

Available commands

name	description	privileged
/help	Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status	Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear	Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry	Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build	Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset	Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset	Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

[bert-e]

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

[BourgoisMickael]

/create_integration_branches

[bert-e]

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

• this pull request will merge bugfix/CLDSRV-835-socket-hang-up into
  development/9.3
• w/9.4/bugfix/CLDSRV-835-socket-hang-up will be merged into development/9.4

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

• development/7.10
• development/7.4
• development/7.70
• development/8.8
• development/9.0
• development/9.1
• development/9.2

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

[bert-e]

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

• the author

• 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

[claude]

LGTM

Review by Claude Code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.23%. Comparing base (b045823) to head (9d7619f).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.3    #6118      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            84.24%   84.23%   -0.01%     
===================================================
  Files                  206      206              
  Lines                13251    13251              
===================================================
- Hits                 11163    11162       -1     
- Misses                2088     2089       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests	67.90% <ø> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests	28.08% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests	69.08% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests	69.12% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
multiple-backend	36.30% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests	35.63% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests-inflights	37.49% <ø> (ø)
unit	69.90% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests	34.36% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.