Skip to content

Reconcile SIP status metadata#88

Open
julienh-ssv wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
F-SIPs-001
Open

Reconcile SIP status metadata#88
julienh-ssv wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
F-SIPs-001

Conversation

@julienh-ssv
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Ticket

  • F-SIPs-001

Summary

This PR reconciles stale SIP status metadata so the index reflects the current authoritative status values.

What changed

  • updates all.md to match the reconciled SIP statuses
  • fixes stale status headers in the affected SIP documents
  • preserves the current docs structure on main and does not recreate the removed category index pages

Review context

This fresh attempt takes into account MatheusFranco99 review comments from the previously closed PR #86.
In particular:

  • constant_qbft_timeout is marked approved
  • pre_consensus_liveness remains open-for-discussion
  • merged SIPs keep spec-merged status where requested in review
  • category ToC files are not reintroduced because that structure was removed on main

Root cause

all.md and several SIP headers had drifted apart over time, leaving the repository with conflicting status information.

Validation

  • compared all.md against all SIP headers and verified there are no remaining status mismatches

@julienh-ssv julienh-ssv self-assigned this Apr 8, 2026
oleg-ssvlabs
oleg-ssvlabs previously approved these changes Apr 9, 2026
olegshmuelov
olegshmuelov previously approved these changes Apr 12, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@olegshmuelov olegshmuelov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. few minor comments

Comment thread all.md
Comment thread all.md
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MatheusFranco99 MatheusFranco99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GJ!

Comment thread all.md Outdated
Comment thread all.md Outdated
ljuba-ssv
ljuba-ssv previously approved these changes Apr 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants